15  Open Science Collaboration (2015)

Discussion paper: Open Science Collaboration (2015) “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”, Science

Supplementary papers:

• Gilbert et al. (2016) “Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"”, Science
• Anderson et al. (2016) “Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"”, Science
• Camerer and Others (2016) “Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics”, Science

This paper sparked wide discussion about the replication crisis.

Anderson, C. J., Bahník, Š., Barnett-Cowan, M., Bosco, F. A., Chandler, J., Chartier, C. R., Cheung, F., Christopherson, C. D., Cordes, A., Cremata, E. J., Della Penna, N., Estel, V., Fedor, A., Fitneva, S. A., Frank, M. C., Grange, J. A., Hartshorne, J. K., Hasselman, F., Henninger, F., … Zuni, K. (2016). Response to comment on “estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”. Science, 351(6277), 1037–1037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9163

Camerer, C. F., and Others. (2016). Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science, 351(6280), 1433–1436. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0918

Gilbert, D. T., King, G., Pettigrew, S., and Wilson, T. D. (2016). Comment on “estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.” Science, 351(6277), 1037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad7243

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716